Kajian Biaya Premi Pengutipan Lateks dan Lump Pada Topografi Datar dan Berbukit Di Kebun Gunung Para PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III

Authors

  • Fadli Akbar Lubis Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar
  • Marzuti Isra Institut Teknologi Sawit Indonesia
  • Purjianto Institut Teknologi Sawit Indonesia
  • Bintang Eka Utama Institut Teknologi Sawit Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47199/jae.v8i2.261

Keywords:

Cost, Latex, Incentive

Abstract

The productivity of rubber plants in the company is not only influenced by technical factors but is also influenced by the flat and hilly topography of the plantation land. This difference in topographic conditions affects basic number of tasks in latex and lump filling process. This research aims to determine costs incurred by companies to pay premium costs for quoting latex and lumps on flat and hilly topography. This research was carried out at Gunung Para Plantation, PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III, Serdang Bedagai, North Sumatra. The method used in this research is decriptive analysis method. The data taken in this research is primary and secondary data. Direct observations were carried out to obtain general information about the Gunung Para Plantation, as well as conducting interviews with Assistant Afdeling V. from the information resulting from this research in can be concluded that at the Gunung Para Plantation, PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III incentive rates for tappers on flat topography are same as those for tappers on hilly topography, however duty base for tappers on hilly topography is low than the normal duty base because topography has a higher risk than on flat topography areas. The research results show that in May - June 2022 there will be an increase in premium payment costs of 214% in flat topographic land areas, and in hilly topographic land areas there will be an increase of 80%. Results of this research emphasize importance of budget planning for financing latex and lump incentives to improve company performance

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arja, A. R., & Supijatno. (2018). Penyadapan Tanaman Karet (Hevea brasiliensis Mull-Arg.) di Perkebunan Karet Gurach Batu Estate, Asahan, Sumatera Utara. Buletin Agrohorti, 6(1).

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Statistik Karet Indonesia 2021. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Damanik, E. P., Susrusa, K. B., & Arisena, G. M. K. (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Produktivitas Tenaga Kerja Penyadap Karet PT Melania Indonesia Mas Estate (Studi Kasus di PT Melania Indonesia Mas Estate Desa Mainan, Kecamatan Sembawa, Kabupaten Banyuasin, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism), 12(1), 103.

Fauzi, I. R., Syarifa, L. F., Herlinawati, E., & Siagian, N. (2014). Keragaan Sistem Premi Penyadap Di Beberapa Perusahaan Perkebunan Karet. Jurnal Penelitian Karet, 32(1), 157–180.

Herlinda, F., Tahir, M., Delvitasari, F., & Riniarti, D. (2022). Evaluasi Kinerja Tenaga Penyadap Karet (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) Berdasarkan Kualitas Sadap. Jurnal Agro Industri Perkebunan, 10(1), 53–64.

Obouayeba, S., Coulibaly, L. F., Gohet, E., Yao, T. N., & Ake, S. (2009). Effect of Tapping Systems and Height of Tapping Opening on Clone PB 235 Agronomic Parameters and it’s Susceptibility To Tapping Panel Dryness in South-East of Côte d’ Ivoire. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 24, 1535–1542.

Pane, E., Siregar, T. H., & Rahman, A. (2017). Model Penanggulangan Kelangkaan Penyadap di Perkebunan Karet. Jurnal Agrica, 10(1), 1.

Pustotok, A., Hastuti, D., & Prabowo, R. (2014). Analisis Pendapatan Karyawan Penyadap Tetap Tanaman Karet (Havea brasiliensis Muell Erg). Mediagro, 10(1), 50–59.

Rouf, A., Tistama, R., Nugrahani, M. O., Wibowo, S. A., Aji, Y. B. S., & Widyasari, T. (2023). Manajemen Penyadapan Tanaman Karet Untuk Mengatasi Kelangkaan Tenaga Penyadap. Warta Perkaretan, 42(1), 11–24.

Setiono, Aji, Y. B. S., Nugrahani, M. O., Rouf, A., & Rimpun, A. (2016). Uji pendahuluan penyadapan dengan “sirkel ” cutting system menggunakan stimulan gas. Warta Perkaretan, 35(2).

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumarmadji, S., Rouf, A., Aji, Y. B. S., & Widyasari, T. (2017). Optimalisasi Produksi Dan Penekanan Biaya Penyadapan Dengan Sistem Sadap Intensitas Rendah. Warta Perkaretan, 36(1), 55–74.

Wiguna, H., & Supijatno. (2015). Manajemen Penyadapan Karet (Hevea brasiliensis Muell Arg.) Perkebunan Karet di Simalungun, Sumatera Utara. Buletin Agrohorti, 3(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Lubis, F. A., Marzuti Isra, Purjianto and Bintang Eka Utama (2024) “Kajian Biaya Premi Pengutipan Lateks dan Lump Pada Topografi Datar dan Berbukit Di Kebun Gunung Para PT. Perkebunan Nusantara III”, Jurnal Agro Estate, 8(2), pp. 89–99. doi: 10.47199/jae.v8i2.261.

Most read articles by the same author(s)